Back Index Next

Newsletter - Issue 6

 

INVESTMENTmatters
NEWSLETTER
ARCHIVE

INVESTMENTIMER
HOMEPAGE


 
Newsletter written by:
Charlie Aitken
SMM(B) Ltd.

 

 

 
SMM(B) Ltd. INVESTMENTmatters Investmentimer.com - Home Page
   

Now for something a bit different.  Instead of banging on about the fortunes (or otherwise) of the US Equity Markets, the following is a piece on an out of favour asset class - Gold.   We would like to thank Merrill Lynch for this opportunity to express our views.


All That Glistens..........?                                                     Feb.  2001 - Issue 6

      
An Investment IFA Speaks Out

 

Over the years it has been our habit to occasionally include the words of a guest writer in our Newsletter. This week, we are handing the soapbox over to one of our longer suffering investors, Charlie Aitken, MD of C Aitken Asset Management. The opinions expressed below are of course his own;

Charlie Aitken:  Among many hundreds of others, I was recently honoured to attend a service of thanksgiving for the life of Julian Baring. I first came to know Julian at the inception of this Fund back in 1988 and my life has been undeniably affected by his enthusiasm for the yellow metal and the companies that mine it. In particular the past few years has set me forth on an unprecedented (for me) analysis of economic history and investor psychology in respect of gold and indeed other financial asset classes.

After the service Graham Birch, asked me whether I would be interested in cobbling a few words together so as to share my enthusiasm with other investors and recipients of the Newsletter. Perhaps the most logical way to provide these thoughts is by way of a Questions and Answers résumé:-

What Makes You Interested in Gold?

I prefer to think of gold as money and not just a commodity. Gold has maintained its real value in money terms for over two thousand years. Those who have owned the gold have had both economic and political power. Gold of course does not represent someone else’s debt. It has long been metala non grata with socialist governments and their endless fiat currency schemes.

There are various views on what causes the price to rise in value, inflationary pressures; political instability; possible conflict/war; economic tension or just good old supply demand imbalances to name but a few. We currently have all of these factors in place.

Gold has been in a near 20 year Bear Market, why should it change now?

As a contrarian investor I am naturally attracted to an asset class that is unloved and under owned. It stimulates my interest to enquire why this is so. I am intrigued that for less than US$3Obn you can own every quoted gold mining company whereas Microsoft alone was recently capitalized at some US$600bn.

One must realise that gold is political. It has a habit of exposing weaknesses in political plans and monetary excess throughout the ages. History is also littered with examples of governments waging war on gold. Focusing on the past 30 years can perhaps guide us to its future course. Most readers will be aware that Nixon moved the dollar from the gold standard in 1971 and that by 1973 every other central banker had done the same. For virtually the first time in history, money creation was backed up by nothing more than a politician’s promise to repay it at some unspecified future date. In 1974 in an attempt to show the world that gold was dead and de-monetized, a ‘barbaric relic’, the US government allowed its citizens to own gold, having confiscated it under Roosevelt in 1933. Contrary to their expectations that the price would fall from the then US$35 level to perhaps US$5 it began a multi year bull market, rising in price to US$850 in 1980 due to the stagflation of the 1970’s.

Ironically the last Bank of England sales, when they sold half of our reserves, was completed in the early 70’s at an average of US$35 an oz.

Since its peak of 1980 the Gold price has gyrated wildly and has (temporarily?) lost the battle to paper money or credit creation. Removal of the gold standard has allowed massive credit expansion culminating today in unprecedented national debt (particularly in the US) and historically high corporate and personal debt levels. Massive credit creation has a habit of ending in tears, with the gold price usually benefiting from its reversal.

Gold has been particularly grim over the past few years. why is this?

A good question. With the supply/demand imbalance over the past few years running at 500t or more per annum the price should have been rising. I for one expected the move from US$330 to US$400 from 1993 to early 1996 to be the beginnings of a sustained bull run.

Patently the gold markets have not been trading as free markets. The undeclared war against gold must have intensified. In a testimony to Congress even Fed chairman Greenspan stated that if the gold price rose it would cast a shadow over the world’s paper currencies.

Regular readers of this Newsletter will be well versed with the twin negatives of Central Bank sales and forward hedging by the mining community over the past few years and the psychological effect of this on investors. The twin negatives drove gold down from US$400 to the US$255 low seen in August 1999. All this at a time that credit creation has gone into overdrive. Since 1995 broad money supply in the US has increased by a huge US$2.6tr or 60%. Total credit market instruments have surged by an astounding 54% to US$26.5tr.

But the price still has not risen?

No, not yet! Whilst I am suspicious but intrigued by conspiracy theories, a growing bank of independent investors and analysts have uncovered widespread efforts to officially suppress the price of gold. Among them the work of Bill Murphy and his team at GATA (Visit www.gata.org) are to be applauded.

The suggestions are that some 15-26,000t of gold derivatives have been created and these are mostly hedged short positions that cannot be unwound or covered in an orderly way in the market. This gold is not being lent. It is being sold into the market.

The US$ has replaced gold as the safe haven status particularly over the most recent years as the financial markets have ballooned. This may however be starting to change. The recent falls in equity prices, most noticeably NASDAQ’s 40% slide from its peak in March is starting to affect the credit markets, with dollar swap spreads straining at very high levels.

A wider earnings contraction is evident by the day, wage price inflation is replacing increasingly worthless share option schemes. All this at a time that a Middle East conflict increases, OPEC regains the initiative and the US shows a void in political leadership.

What is really different this time, relative to previous ends of credit excess, is the amount of derivatives in play. Allegedly some US$ 1OOtr if one includes the investment banks; other financial institutions and the hedge fund community. To put this into context, the risk of financial meltdown in the autumn of 1998 was down to one hedge fund, LTCM with a market exposure of US$1tr!

Although the Washington Agreement of September 1999 effectively drew a line under the proposed central bank sales, lending has continued at a high level. At a recent central banking conference, a representative from Venezuela observed that continued lower prices of gold only devalues central banks’ own assets. He said that they have lost US$15bn to date in 2000 and only made US$30m from the gold loans. The question must be, ‘Why would central banks continue with this strategy unless they wished to suppress the price’?

I recall Julian’s analogy in respect of ‘selling the family silver’ (read gold) and we are witnessing a transfer from West to East, which perhaps indicates where the pendulum of power is heading longer term. Aside of India’s historical belief in the value of gold and hence the largest acquirers, China, representing 25% of the world’s population is only just opening their gold market. The results are fairly predictive.

In conclusion, whilst my crystal ball may be no clearer than anyone else’s, analysis and intuition suggests that loyalty is shortly to be rewarded and rewarded in a big way. It will not be in a straight line and there will be casualties within the mining community. Ashanti’s failing, taught us that after the Washington Agreement rally. The impending scenario would ideally suit a long/short fund, long the unhedged/short the aggressively hedged mines, but this is unlikely to be available as a UK regulated fund in the near future.

Therefore we are delighted to remain invested with Graham and his team without doubt, in my opinion, the best team in town.

Charlie Aitken is the MD of C Aitken Asset Management, a South Coast based advisor.

 

This newsletter relates to the packaged products of, and is issued by,

MERRILL LYNCH FUND MANAGERS LIMITED.

33 KING WILLIAM STREET LONDON EC4R 9AS TELEPHONE: 020 7743 3000 FAX 020 7743 1000

REGISTERED OFFICE AS ABOVE. REGISTERED IN ENGLAND NO 1102517

The Merrill Lynch unit trusts are managed by Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited which is a member of the Association of Unit Trusts and Investment Funds and is regulated by IMRO and Personal Investment Authority. Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited is the unit trust management arm of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Limited which is also regulated by IMRO. You should remember that the value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and are not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount they invest. Rates of exchange may cause the value of the investment to fluctuate. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. This newsletter only relates to Merrill Lynch Gold & General Fund. The views expressed are as at the date hereof and are subject to change. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Merrill Lynch Group as a whole or any part thereof, nor do they constitute investment or any other advice.


2003 Investmentmatters is published by SMM(B) Ltd.

Whilst SMM(B) Ltd.  believes that the information provided is correct it does not represent that the information presented is comprehensive, complete, verified or accurate. 

This publication does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to purchase or subscribe to any services provided by SMM(B) Ltd. or its trading division, Investmentimer.com, excepting in directing you to websites (www.summitmoneymanagement.bm  and www.investmentimer.com) for your perusal.

The value and income from an investment may fall as well as rise and as such should be considered as medium to longer term in nature.

Top of Page